Skip to content

Amazon Interview Experiences

How Amazon’s SDE interviews actually run, based on aggregated candidate reports (Blind, Glassdoor, GeeksforGeeks, 1Point3Acres). Amazon runs large-scale campus and off-campus SDE-1 drives in India, so this loop is common, not a rare, boutique process.

Reported total compensation for an India-based SDE-1 fresher hire is in the ₹26-32 LPA range (Levels.fyi median ~₹26L; base commonly ₹18-22L plus sign-on bonus and RSUs), though offers vary by college tier and location - treat this as a reported range, not a guarantee.

Round Duration What it tests
Online Assessment (OA) ~2-3 hrs total 2 DSA problems + work-simulation module + LP-aligned behavioural questions
Virtual onsite - Coding (1-2 rounds) 45-60 min each DSA (medium-hard) + 1-2 Leadership Principle questions
Virtual onsite - Design 45-60 min OOD for SDE-1; scalable system design for SDE-2+
Bar Raiser 45-75 min Deep-dive Leadership Principles only, cross-checked against every other round
Hiring manager / offer 20-30 min Team fit, location, compensation, close

Profile: B.Tech CSE, tier-1 college, 2 internships, steady DSA practice, campus drive

Online Assessment

  • Coding: maximum sum subarray with at most k elements, and cloning a graph with random pointers. Both needed all test cases passing, not just a partial solution.
  • Work-simulation module: email-style prompts on prioritizing conflicting tasks and responding to a customer escalation.
  • Behavioural MCQs framed around ownership and customer obsession - no free text, just scenario choices.

Virtual onsite - coding

  • Design a data structure supporting insert/delete/getRandom in O(1) - hashmap + array-list approach.
  • Longest substring with at most k distinct characters (sliding window), with a follow-up on optimising space.
  • A Leadership Principle question slipped in mid-round: “Tell me about a time you went above and beyond for a customer.”

Virtual onsite - design

  • Design a bookstore system (OOD): classes, relationships, methods, then a follow-up on handling concurrent orders.

Bar Raiser

  • Design an LRU cache (medium-hard), then “How would you scale this bookstore system to millions of users?”
  • Multiple deep follow-ups on a “took ownership of a project” story - the interviewer kept asking “what else did you consider, and why not that instead?”

Result: Selected What helped: A distinct story for each Leadership Principle question rather than recycling the same “led a project” anecdote across rounds.

Profile: B.Tech IT, tier-2 college, 1 internship, off-campus application

What differed

  • OA coding leaned harder on graphs: Word Ladder-style shortest transformation, and merging k sorted lists.
  • The design round asked for a simplified Twitter-style feed instead of a bookstore - same OOD depth, different domain.
  • The Bar Raiser mixed one graph problem with unusually deep behavioural probing on a single “disagreed with a decision” story - three separate follow-up questions on that one answer.

Mistakes that hurt other candidates in the same drive

  • Treating Leadership Principle questions as filler instead of real evaluation criteria in the technical rounds
  • Reusing the same STAR story across two different rounds - Bar Raisers can see prior interviewer feedback
  • Jumping into the design round without asking about scale or constraints first

Result: Selected Takeaway: Amazon’s technical bar is real, but a thin, memorized Leadership Principles story falls apart faster here than a slightly rougher technical answer with a clear thought process.

  1. Maximum sum subarray with at most k elements
  2. Clone a graph with random pointers
  3. Longest substring with at most k distinct characters - sliding window
  4. Design an LRU cache - hashmap + doubly linked list
  5. Merge k sorted lists
  6. Design a data structure supporting insert/delete/getRandom in O(1)
  1. Design a parking lot or bookstore system (OOD, SDE-1)
  2. Design a URL shortener or distributed cache
  3. Design a scalable order-processing system (SDE-2+)
  1. Tell me about a time you went above and beyond for a customer (Customer Obsession)
  2. Describe a decision you made with incomplete data (Bias for Action)
  3. Tell me about a time you disagreed with your team’s direction (Have Backbone; Disagree and Commit)
  4. Give an example where you simplified something overly complex (Invent and Simplify)
  5. Tell me about the highest standard you’ve held a project to (Insist on the Highest Standards)
  • Solve the OA’s coding problems for all test cases, not just the visible ones - partial credit is less forgiving here.
  • Treat the work-simulation module as a real evaluation, not a formality - it’s scored against the Leadership Principles too.
  • Prepare a different STAR story for each Leadership Principle you’re likely to be asked about, and never repeat one across rounds.
  • For design rounds, ask about scale and constraints before sketching a solution - Amazon interviewers note candidates who jump straight to an answer.
  • In the Bar Raiser, expect the interviewer to keep pulling on one story with “what else did you consider” - have real alternatives ready, not just the option you picked.

Amazon doesn’t run a separate generic HR round - Leadership Principles evaluation is spread across every stage, and the Bar Raiser doubles as the deepest behavioural check. Prepare STAR frameworks for the Leadership Principles on the dedicated page.

Google · Microsoft · Meta · Apple · Netflix · Flipkart